𝑷𝒐𝒍𝒊𝒄𝒆 𝑹𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒗𝒔 𝑱𝒖𝒅𝒊𝒄𝒊𝒂𝒍 𝑹𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒅: 𝑬𝒙𝒑𝒍𝒂𝒊𝒏𝒆𝒅 𝑪𝒍𝒆𝒂𝒓𝒍𝒚

 

𝗗𝗶𝘀𝗰𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗿 : 𝗧𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗹𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝘄𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗻 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗹𝗲𝗴𝗮𝗹 𝗮𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗲𝗱𝘂𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗽𝘂𝗿𝗽𝗼𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝗼𝗻𝗹𝘆. 𝗟𝗲𝗴𝗮𝗹 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗰𝗲𝗱𝘂𝗿𝗲𝘀 𝗺𝗮𝘆 𝘃𝗮𝗿𝘆 𝗱𝗲𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗼𝗻 𝗳𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘀, 𝗻𝗮𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗼𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗷𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻. 𝗜𝘁 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗯𝗲 𝘁𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗮𝘀 𝗹𝗲𝗴𝗮𝗹 𝗮𝗱𝘃𝗶𝗰𝗲.

𝑷𝒐𝒍𝒊𝒄𝒆 𝑹𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒗𝒔 𝑱𝒖𝒅𝒊𝒄𝒊𝒂𝒍 𝑹𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒅: 𝑬𝒙𝒑𝒍𝒂𝒊𝒏𝒆𝒅 𝑪𝒍𝒆𝒂𝒓𝒍𝒚


In criminal proceedings, an accused person may be placed under police remand or judicial remand after arrest. Both are forms of custody but differ in purpose, authority, and conditions.

Police remand means the accused is kept in police custody for interrogation. It is granted by a magistrate when investigation requires questioning or recovery of evidence. Police remand is time-bound and cannot be extended beyond the limits prescribed by law.

Judicial remand means the accused is sent to jail custody under the supervision of the court. Once judicial remand is ordered, the police cannot interrogate the accused without court permission. This form of remand is meant to ensure custody while protecting the accused from undue pressure.

The magistrate plays a key role in deciding which remand is necessary. The decision depends on factors such as stage of investigation, seriousness of the offence, and need for interrogation.

Understanding the difference between police and judicial remand helps citizens know how custody works and safeguards personal liberty during criminal proceedings.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Can Technology Replace Human Judges?

Why Law Should Be Taught in Schools .

Lesser - Known Facts About Indian Laws .